seaboards (
seaboards) wrote in
shellphones2024-03-01 08:54 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
- -manta board,
- aerith gainsborough,
- alhaitham,
- anthony crowley,
- ardbert hylfyst,
- astarion,
- benedikta harman,
- cidolfus telamon,
- clive rosfield,
- cyrus douglas,
- daria morgendorffer,
- darin altway,
- dehya,
- demyx,
- denji,
- dongfang qingcang,
- emet-selch,
- freminet,
- gale dekarios,
- garrus vakarian,
- goro akechi,
- grace,
- graha tia,
- izuku midoriya,
- jill warrick,
- kaveh,
- kotori iida,
- lloyd irving,
- nimona,
- orchid,
- ranma saotome,
- rin nesidri,
- roxas,
- ryotaro dojima,
- sherlock holmes,
- shikanoin heizou,
- sidestep,
- tianyou zhao,
- vanessa ives,
- xenk yendar,
- zack fair
« two truths and a lie »
TWO TRUTHS AND A LIE
There have been a lot of riftfarers arriving lately. It seems like there have been more arriving than usual. So many different kinds of people from different kinds of worlds with stories to tell and experiences to give.
A little game has appeared on the shellphone network in hopes of getting to know just a little more about these otherworlders. You might find it on your shellphone as you’re scrolling through one day.
Tell the world two truths and one lie about yourself. And let others try and decipher which of the three is your lie. If they can guess right, perhaps you’ve been able to make a new acquaintance. Or in the least learn more about someone from another walk of life.
text | yuezun
i'm so sorry you activated him
no subject
no subject
no subject
uno reverse
Second of all, it is a biological hierarchy I cannot change--the gods are physically different than humanity. Do you disrespect a cat for not thinking as a human does?
third of all it's deeply narrow-minded to be unable to view the perspective of others you believe to be beneath you.
Reverse uno reverse
Additionally, many mortals have cultivated to immortality and become gods through the centuries. If you are unable to do so, that is also your own failing.
Finally, since you have offered three points: You may only be able to measure beauty and 'cuteness' by standards you have developed, but that does not make it an objective truth. It is rude and narrow-minded to assume it does.
But yes, this venerable one can be very rude.
DRAW FOUR
The cultivating of immortality that the Adepti do does not automatically qualify them for divinity, though it makes them immortal. I have no interest in immortality--to live forever is not the pinnacle of wisdom nor truth. All things, even gods, can die, and erosion is inevitable. The impermanence of mortal beings should, too, be valued. It is not a failing to be uninterested in eternity, but a personal preference. This debate point lacks merit.
Beauty and 'cuteness' are separate concepts. The beauty of art is created by the principles that guide it, and how they are adhered to or creatively broken to communicate the experiences of the artist, even long after that moment and experience has passed. By contrast, cuteness can refer to a broad range of things, including a biological defense mechanism. So there is nothing at all incongruous with finding the strange tastes of another somewhat cute, especially if it is at odds with their outward demeanor.
DAQIANG IS VERY CONFUSED WITH THIS METAPHOR
That does not stop him from moving to video, but he does have to adjust how he speaks. And how much he can get away with berating the man.
A Moon Supreme shaped Orchid may or may not be seen in the background attempting to take the shellphone away from the Orchid shaped Daqiang and forcing the two to play a very chaotic game of keep-away.]Thi- I think you are being doubly rude. This is not an academic paper and you are creating new standards by which to measure the arguments simply because the current ones don't favor you.
no subject
but I am being vague about him figuring anything out until apps are processed.]I was talking about academic principles of art to begin with. What did you think this was about?
no subject
no subject
[. . .]
Perhaps I ought to have clarified from the start.
no subject
[Sounding very offended, here.]
no subject
[Because you are VERY angry for some reason ma'amsir?]
no subject
Oh. yeah. he messed up big time.
Hastily, he shook his head.]
No. Of course not.
Goodbye.
[Heard off screen as he goes to hang-up:
Done! See! No mo-]
no subject
He'll have to check up on if she's alright later.]