ᴢᴇʟᴅᴀ (
multidisciplinary) wrote in
shellphones2024-11-14 11:23 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
text🌻seeking legal advice
Type: Text (backdated to before Farplane event)
Sender ID: Anonymous
To: Public
Subject: Seeking legal advice
Warnings: None
--
Hello.
I am in need of legal advice regarding a private matter:
Is a marriage contract legally binding if one or more parties involved were under the influence of spiritual possession while it was officiated?
Thank you for your assistance.
Sender ID: Anonymous
To: Public
Subject: Seeking legal advice
Warnings: None
--
Hello.
I am in need of legal advice regarding a private matter:
Is a marriage contract legally binding if one or more parties involved were under the influence of spiritual possession while it was officiated?
Thank you for your assistance.
no subject
However, based on the first two, the marriage should not be considered binding: you used the spirits names instead of your own, so technically you provided false information. Thus, you are not contractually married to whoever it was you did this with. Legally, the marriage license would be thrown out because of it as a result.
Plus, even if you did consent to the possession at some point, a marriage license would be easily anulled or thrown out under the argument that you were "under the influence", like how some people will sometimes become intoxicated or inebriated enough to think it's a good idea to get married after consuming a large quantity of alcohol or what have you, only to regret it the next day when they sober up. Possession may not be the same thing as being drunk, obviously, but it's still a state of being that can be considered an impairment of one's judgement and therefore any actions or words said during should not be taken seriously on your account.
no subject
But something sticks out at her as she goes over it a second time. ]
Wait a moment, would this render the marriage license void for the spirits as well?
no subject
To be honest, I've only ever once dealt with spirits that were attempting to conduct a marriage ceremony, and at the time a marriage license was not necessary, as they were simply happy to consider the ceremony itself as all the proof they needed to be happy with the results.
But in your case since there was in fact one that was submitted and signed by the spirits with their names... I think it would depend on whether or not it would be ruled that they did technically sign it with "their" dominant hand when possessing your body to do so?
no subject
The marriage agreement was purely oral; the minister would later record the names of the wedded partners within his registry, to later be added to the Naughtilust's vital records. The spirit was in full control of my body when she made her vows, but her words were spoken in my voice, as she was incapable of audible speech on her own.
no subject
[Hmmmmm]
In that case, I think you're still in the clear: their names are the ones on the registered, not yours, so the spirits can be considered legally married: you, however, are not considered legally married, since it is not your name that was recorded for a marriage document instead.
no subject
You are quite certain? Oh thank goodness. That is exactly the outcome I wanted from the outset: that only the spirits be legally wed, not myself and my companion.
Thank you for your assistance! Your legal knowledge is most impressive. Are you as scholar of law?
no subject
no subject
no subject
[There's a pause before he adds--]
Â
Of course, even if my office is not here, I am always open to helping anyone who needs my help while I'm in this place, so I'm glad that I was able to provide some advice for you on this matter.
no subject
[ Nevermind that she's anonymous right now. She's just happy someone could actually give her a real answer to her question. ]