multidisciplinary: do not take! (🌻 532)
ᴢᴇʟᴅᴀ ([personal profile] multidisciplinary) wrote in [community profile] shellphones2024-11-14 11:23 am

text🌻seeking legal advice

Type: Text (backdated to before Farplane event)
Sender ID: Anonymous
To: Public
Subject: Seeking legal advice
Warnings: None

--

Hello.

I am in need of legal advice regarding a private matter:

Is a marriage contract legally binding if one or more parties involved were under the influence of spiritual possession while it was officiated?

Thank you for your assistance.
onebullet: (under way)

[personal profile] onebullet 2024-11-14 08:29 pm (UTC)(link)
[ God this is going to give Shepard a headache. ]

Let me get this straight:

Were you in control, or were they?
Edited (ME TAGS) 2024-11-14 20:29 (UTC)
onebullet: (hard to fathom)

[personal profile] onebullet 2024-11-14 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
[ Nothing's ever simple. Does Garrus even have any painkillers here? ]

So you allowed them to possess you for the marriage.

But were fighting for control at times?

So you weren't a completely willing host?


[ Good grief. ]
onebullet: (improvise)

[personal profile] onebullet 2024-11-15 08:55 pm (UTC)(link)
[ Truly. ]

Could argue that if they hadn't possessed you against your will in the first place, you wouldn't have agreed to let them do it.

Doesn't matter whether that's true or not, you could void it based on that.
onebullet: (bamcis)

[personal profile] onebullet 2024-11-16 09:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Nothing wrong with a white lie every now and then.

But is it true?
onebullet: (pop smoke)

[personal profile] onebullet 2024-11-20 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Sure, but would you have gone through the ceremony yourself?
onebullet: (snap in)

[personal profile] onebullet 2024-12-06 03:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd argue that's entrapment. Meaning, you shouldn't be bound to the marriage.

And if that's not good enough for the lawmakers here, throw a divorce party instead.
Edited (I FORGOR THE RIGHT WORD) 2024-12-06 15:53 (UTC)